Shareholders Meetings – How, when and why?

Shareholders Meetings – How, when and why?



In order for a company to achieve its objectives, it must make decisions about its day-to-day operations, as well as its long-term goals and business aspirations. So, you may ask, how does one practically give effect to this? And between the shareholders and the board of directors (“the Board”), who is responsible for what? As a broad construct, one can use “the tree and the fruits” metaphor, in that any decision pertaining to the tree (or the income earning structure of the company), typically falls within the realm of the shareholders, and any decision pertaining to the fruits (or the income earning operations) of the company, typically falls within the realm of the Board. In this article, for the sake of simplicity, we will explain the purpose and importance of shareholders’ meetings by deconstructing them under three basic questions: “Why, When and How?”. The topic of Board meetings will be covered in a future article.


The purpose of shareholders’ meetings is to provide the shareholders of a company with an opportunity to debate and vote on matters affecting that company. The Companies Act, 71 of 2008 (“Act”) gives shareholders certain substantive powers which include, among others, the power to amend the Memorandum of Incorporation of the company (“MOI”), the power to elect and remove directors, and the power to approve the disposal of all or the greater part of the company’s assets.

The Act draws a distinction between a general shareholders’ meeting and an annual general meeting (“AGM”). An AGM is a shareholders’ meeting which is held once in every calendar year (but no more than 15 months after the date of the previous AGM), and at which very specific business must be transacted. Under the old Companies Act, 61 of 1973 (“Old Act”) both public and private companies were required to convene an AGM. However, under the new Act, it is no longer mandatory for a private company to convene an AGM, unless its MOI provides otherwise.


The Board may call a shareholders’ meeting at any time – it must, however, hold a shareholders’ meeting:

  • when the Board is required by the Act or the company’s MOI to refer a matter to the shareholders for decision;
  • whenever required in terms of section 70(3) of the Act to fill a vacancy on the Board;
  • when one or more written and signed demands for a shareholders’ meeting are delivered to the company by the shareholders;
  • when an AGM of the shareholders is required to be convened; and
  • whenever otherwise required by the company’s MOI.


Notice: Typically, a shareholders’ meeting may only be convened once the notice requirements have been complied with. A company must deliver a notice of each shareholders’ meeting in the manner and form prescribed by the Act to all shareholders of the Company. In the case of a private company the notice period is at least 10 business days before the meeting is to begin. The notice requirements contained in the Act serve only as a guideline and a company’s MOI may provide for different minimum notice periods. A shareholders’ meeting may also be called on shorter notice than the period prescribed, provided that every shareholder who is entitled to vote is present at the meeting and votes to waive the minimum notice period.

Proxies: A shareholder entitled to attend and vote at a shareholders’ meeting is entitled to appoint a proxy (who need not also be a shareholder) to attend, participate in and vote at the meeting in the place of such shareholder.

Quorum: A quorum is the minimum number of persons whose presence at a meeting is required before any business may validly be transacted. A shareholders’ meeting may not commence until sufficient persons are present to exercise, in aggregate, at least 25% of the voting rights in respect of at least one matter to be decided. Furthermore, a matter to be decided on may not begin to be considered unless sufficient persons are present at the meeting to exercise, in aggregate, at least 25% of all the voting rights entitled to be exercised on that particular matter. The Act allows the MOI to specify a different quorum threshold. It is worth noting that once the quorum requirements for a meeting to commence or for a matter to be considered have been satisfied, the meeting may continue as long as at least one shareholder with voting rights is still present at the meeting, unless the company’s MOI provides otherwise.

Voting: Matters that are set for determination at a shareholders’ meeting are framed as resolutions and are put to a vote by the shareholders. A shareholders’ resolution is either an ordinary resolution (needs to be supported by more than 50% of the voting rights exercised on the resolution) or a special resolution (needs to be supported by at least 75% of the voting rights exercised on the resolution). The MOI of the company may permit a higher percentage of voting rights to approve an ordinary resolution and/or a different percentage of voting rights to approve a special resolution, provided that there must at all times be a margin of at least 10% between the two types of resolutions’ voting thresholds.

Voting may take place either by a show of hands or by a poll. On a show of hands, a shareholder entitled to exercise voting rights present at the meeting (or his / her proxy) only has one vote, regardless of the number of voting rights linked to the securities the relevant shareholder holds and would otherwise be entitled to exercise. Voting in this manner is well suited to taking uncontroversial decisions quickly. Voting by a poll, on the other hand, is determined in accordance with the voting rights associated with the number of securities held by that shareholder, for example, if the shareholder holds 50 out of 200 shares in issue, the shareholder would be entitled to exercise 25% of the total voting rights.

Electronic communication and written resolutions (round robin resolutions)

A company may make provision for its shareholders’ meetings to be conducted by way of electronic communication, subject to the condition that the electronic communication allows all meeting participants to participate reasonably effectively in the meeting and to communicate concurrently with each other without an intermediary.

Instead of calling and holding a formal shareholders’ meeting, the Act also provides that shareholders may consent in writing to certain decisions that would otherwise be voted on at a meeting. Such resolutions must be submitted to the shareholders entitled to vote in relation thereto, and be voted on by such shareholders, in writing, within 20 business days after the resolutions were submitted to them. A written resolution will have been adopted if its supported by persons entitled to exercise sufficient voting rights for it to have been adopted as an ordinary or special resolution, as a the case may be. Such decisions have the same effect as if they had been approved by voting at a formal shareholders’ meeting.

This flexibility is very welcome since it encourages shareholders to play a more active role in the company’s affairs and provides the company with a quick and efficient means of holding meetings and passing resolutions.

6 thoughts on “Shareholders Meetings – How, when and why?

  1. Hi, Can a special resolution be passed by shareholders holding 70% of the voting rights if the MOI is amended to allow this for a privately owned company>

    Thanking you in anticipation of your response.

  2. What are the implications and obligations for a Closed Corporation? Specifically wrt the rights of shareholders to convene meeting?

    1. Hi Renier,

      Thank you for your comment. Please note that the article was written within the specific context of a private company. Since the coming into effect of the new Companies Act, 71 of 2008, no new close corporations (CC’s) can be registered, although the ones that have already been registered will continue to exist as such.

      One key difference between a CC and a private company, is that a CC has no share capital and therefore no shareholders. Rather, the owners of the CC are the members of the CC, who have a membership interest expressed as a percentage. Membership is restricted to natural persons or a trust and to a maximum of 10 members.

      Generally speaking, the rules for governance of a CC are more relaxed, for instance there are no strict rules relating to the maintenance of capital, and they also enjoy flexibility in the arrangement of their internal relationships. There are no directors and all members have an equal say, but they carry the risk of personal liability. The fiduciary duties and duties of care and skill are codified, and the accounting and disclosure provisions are less extensive for a CC.

      With regards to convening a meeting, there is no requirement for conducting an annual general meeting, for example and it will be the members who are responsible for the day to day management of the CC. The Close Corporations Act, 69 of 1984 (“the Close Corporations Act”) states that all decisions can be decided by majority vote at a meeting of members, provided that consent in writing of members holding at least 75% of the members interest is required for certain decisions, such as changing the principal business of the CC, or disposal of all or the greater portion of the assets of the CC.

      In addition to the above, if a CC has more than 2 members, they may enter into an association agreement, which may contain further provisions regulating the conduct of members, meetings etc, as long as it is consistent with the Close Corporations Act.

      You are welcome to contact our team at Dommisse Attorneys, should you require more information.

  3. Hi

    Interesting article.

    What would happen if a private company (Pty) Ltd has 2 directors and 4 shareholders (all six of them including the directors have an equal share)

    They all are in different geographic locations and require to sell the greater part of the company to settle a creditor. i.e. 3 assets out of 6 (the 3 assets to be sold are greater in value).

    Can a round robin special resolution be done via their respective attorneys given that they are not in the same location? What would happen if one of the 6 does not sign the special resolution but the remainder does? (remember they all have equal shares).

    Nothing is mentioned in the MOI hence i assume the companies act will take precedent.

    Thank you kindly.

    1. Good morning Yusef,

      The sale of the greater part of the assets of a company is regulated by section 112 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 and requires specific procedures to be followed by the board and shareholders of the company. However, please note the specific approval requirements set out in section 115 of the Companies Act for such transactions.

      A special resolution may be concluded via round robin procedures as resolutions may be signed in counterparts and need not be facilitated by attorneys.

      We would be happy to discuss further. Please contact us to can set up a meeting to discuss and engage us further in this regard.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *